物理学者と素粒子好きのみなさんとの、ILC(リニアコライダー)にまつわる対話集。
好奇心のおもむくまま話はいろいろなことろに、飛んでいきます! はてさて、素粒子物理研究の一端をここで垣間見る見ることはできるのでしょうか?
▼はじめのごあいさつ
![]()
広島大学准教授。スタンフォード線形加速器センターへて、広島大学へ。リニアコライダーでは「レーザーと電子ビーム」をキーワードに光子光子衝突や偏極陽電子源の開発を行っている。小学校のときは剣道場へ通い、中学・高校ではサッカー部だった。今でも週2回のスポーツジム通いは欠かさない。
![]()
バレエ評論家。第4回・5回日本ダンス評論賞入賞。好きなものはバレエと猫。著書に『「星座」になった人 芥川龍之介次男・多加志の青春』(新潮社)がある。
![]()
高エネルギー物理学実験を楽しんできたが、1年半前に KEKを定年退職して現在は名誉教授に。05年には木原元央氏と共著にて『リニアコライダー 素粒子の謎に挑む最強の加速器』(技術経済研究所)を刊行。
![]()
カリフォルニア工科大学大学院に留学し、スタンフォード線形加速器センター、フェルミ研究所等で素粒子実験に携わる。ハーバード大学准教授、ハワイ大学教授を経て現在東北大学教授。ILCの物理と実験に関する国際組織のアジア代表を務めている。趣味は茶道、ピアノ、インラインスケートなど。
![]()
2008年10月30日
The birth of the Kobayashi-Maskawa mechanism of CP violation
This is based on a chat I had with Prof. Maskawa
on Feb 9, 2001 (Fri).
Maskawa-san was about 5 years senior of Kobayashi-san.
Maskawa-san was a joshu at Nagoya which expired in 3 years
and then moved to Kyoto U. At about the same time,
Kobayashi-san was hired at Kyoto as a joshu also.
The quark mixing in weak interaction that Cabibbo introduced
in 1963 had been extended to a credible 4-quark theory
by Glashow, Iliopoulos, and Maiani in 1970. Since then,
many people had been working on 4-quark models.
The 4-th quark, charm, was not discovered yet. Maskawa-san
and Kobayashi-san were also working on 4-quark models,
but their focus was to explain the CP violation that had been
observed in the decay of neutral Kaon several years earlier.
QCD was not established yet, and if the strong interaction
violated SU(4), then CP violation could occur in 4-quark model.
The first correct choice was to assume that the strong
interaction did not contribute to CP violation, and that
CP violation would occur in the framework of the gauge theory
of weak and electromagnetic interactions. It then became
clear that there could be no CP violation in the 4-quark models.
The mode of operation was that Maskawa-san came up with
various models which Kobayashi-san would examine and kill.
Kabayashi-san was so able and also knowledgeable about
experimental constraints that most models were rejected
one after another.
It was clear that if the number of quarks were increased,
then there could be CP violation. However, it looked quite
adventurous to propose a 6 quark model when the 4th quark
had not even been found yet. At one night in the bath tab,
Maskawa-san was resigned that probably the point of the paper
should be that there would be no CP violation within 4-quark models.
Then, when he got up from the tab, he thought maybe they should
emphasize that there would be CP violation with 6-quark models.
A slight shift of focus. But it was not the only ingredient that led to
the discovery of so-called Kobayashi-Maskawa mechanism of
CP violation.
The quark mixing matrix, which is called
the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix, is a product of
two unitary matrixes that diagonalize left-handed up-type quarks
and left-handed down-type quarks. The diagonalization is
performed by bi-unitary transformations where the unitary
transformations of right-handed quarks also participate
but do not get included in the CKM matrix.
Bi-unitary transformation was not too well known, but
Maskawa-san had studied the chiral transformation of pions
where each of two indexes transforms by a separate matrix.
He was thus well prepared to tackle the topic of quark mixing
matrix and figure out how a CP-violating complex phase
could sneak into the weak interaction of quarks.
On the other hand, Kobayashi-san was able to quickly figure out
what forms of interaction could and could not lead to the observed
CP violation. When it was combined with the mathematical ability
of Maskawa-san, the result was that the standard theory of
CP violation is now called the ‘Kobayashi-Maskawa mechanism.’
Yes, there existed good reasons why they were the first.
Hitoshi Yamamoto(Tohoku University)
Copyright©2006 Linear Collider Forum ,All rights reserved.